Suchergebnisse

International audience ; "This article focuses on the changing relation between nature and the urban environment during the 19th et 20th centuries (and even until the 21st) in Europe and the United States, a relation described mainly in terms of public health. Territorial planning and development along with the rules of urbanism have long been the means for political interventions interested in dimensions for the purpose of monitoring and controlling violations and ultimately preserving life. Taking account of the environmental dimensions in urban health policies leads us to re-examine the relations between territorial planning and nature as well as the role played by various stakeholders in the health policy field." ; "Cet article traite de l'évolution de la relation entre la nature et l'environnement urbain au cours des XIXe et XXe siècles, et même jusqu'au XXIe siècle en Europe et aux États-Unis, une relation qui a été principalement abordée en termes de santé publique. L'aménagement de l'espace et les règles d'urbanisme ont longtemps été les outils d'un engagement politique s'intéressant à toutes les dimensions de la vie afin de surveiller et contrôler les atteintes qui pourraient lui être portées, et in fine de la préserver. La prise en compte des dimensions environnementales dans les politiques territoriales de santé conduit à revoir les liens aménagement/nature ainsi que le rôle des différents acteurs impliqués dans les politiques de santé."

International audience ; "This article focuses on the changing relation between nature and the urban environment during the 19th et 20th centuries (and even until the 21st) in Europe and the United States, a relation described mainly in terms of public health. Territorial planning and development along with the rules of urbanism have long been the means for political interventions interested in dimensions for the purpose of monitoring and controlling violations and ultimately preserving life. Taking account of the environmental dimensions in urban health policies leads us to re-examine the relations between territorial planning and nature as well as the role played by various stakeholders in the health policy field." ; "Cet article traite de l'évolution de la relation entre la nature et l'environnement urbain au cours des XIXe et XXe siècles, et même jusqu'au XXIe siècle en Europe et aux États-Unis, une relation qui a été principalement abordée en termes de santé publique. L'aménagement de l'espace et les règles d'urbanisme ont longtemps été les outils d'un engagement politique s'intéressant à toutes les dimensions de la vie afin de surveiller et contrôler les atteintes qui pourraient lui être portées, et in fine de la préserver. La prise en compte des dimensions environnementales dans les politiques territoriales de santé conduit à revoir les liens aménagement/nature ainsi que le rôle des différents acteurs impliqués dans les politiques de santé."

This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments.

International audience ; "This article focuses on the changing relation between nature and the urban environment during the 19th et 20th centuries (and even until the 21st) in Europe and the United States, a relation described mainly in terms of public health. Territorial planning and development along with the rules of urbanism have long been the means for political interventions interested in dimensions for the purpose of monitoring and controlling violations and ultimately preserving life. Taking account of the environmental dimensions in urban health policies leads us to re-examine the relations between territorial planning and nature as well as the role played by various stakeholders in the health policy field." ; "Cet article traite de l'évolution de la relation entre la nature et l'environnement urbain au cours des XIXe et XXe siècles, et même jusqu'au XXIe siècle en Europe et aux États-Unis, une relation qui a été principalement abordée en termes de santé publique. L'aménagement de l'espace et les règles d'urbanisme ont longtemps été les outils d'un engagement politique s'intéressant à toutes les dimensions de la vie afin de surveiller et contrôler les atteintes qui pourraient lui être portées, et in fine de la préserver. La prise en compte des dimensions environnementales dans les politiques territoriales de santé conduit à revoir les liens aménagement/nature ainsi que le rôle des différents acteurs impliqués dans les politiques de santé."

International audience ; "This article focuses on the changing relation between nature and the urban environment during the 19th et 20th centuries (and even until the 21st) in Europe and the United States, a relation described mainly in terms of public health. Territorial planning and development along with the rules of urbanism have long been the means for political interventions interested in dimensions for the purpose of monitoring and controlling violations and ultimately preserving life. Taking account of the environmental dimensions in urban health policies leads us to re-examine the relations between territorial planning and nature as well as the role played by various stakeholders in the health policy field." ; "Cet article traite de l'évolution de la relation entre la nature et l'environnement urbain au cours des XIXe et XXe siècles, et même jusqu'au XXIe siècle en Europe et aux États-Unis, une relation qui a été principalement abordée en termes de santé publique. L'aménagement de l'espace et les règles d'urbanisme ont longtemps été les outils d'un engagement politique s'intéressant à toutes les dimensions de la vie afin de surveiller et contrôler les atteintes qui pourraient lui être portées, et in fine de la préserver. La prise en compte des dimensions environnementales dans les politiques territoriales de santé conduit à revoir les liens aménagement/nature ainsi que le rôle des différents acteurs impliqués dans les politiques de santé."

International audience ; "This article focuses on the changing relation between nature and the urban environment during the 19th et 20th centuries (and even until the 21st) in Europe and the United States, a relation described mainly in terms of public health. Territorial planning and development along with the rules of urbanism have long been the means for political interventions interested in dimensions for the purpose of monitoring and controlling violations and ultimately preserving life. Taking account of the environmental dimensions in urban health policies leads us to re-examine the relations between territorial planning and nature as well as the role played by various stakeholders in the health policy field." ; "Cet article traite de l'évolution de la relation entre la nature et l'environnement urbain au cours des XIXe et XXe siècles, et même jusqu'au XXIe siècle en Europe et aux États-Unis, une relation qui a été principalement abordée en termes de santé publique. L'aménagement de l'espace et les règles d'urbanisme ont longtemps été les outils d'un engagement politique s'intéressant à toutes les dimensions de la vie afin de surveiller et contrôler les atteintes qui pourraient lui être portées, et in fine de la préserver. La prise en compte des dimensions environnementales dans les politiques territoriales de santé conduit à revoir les liens aménagement/nature ainsi que le rôle des différents acteurs impliqués dans les politiques de santé."

International audience ; "This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments."

International audience ; "This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments."

International audience ; "This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments."

International audience ; This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments.

International audience ; "This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments."

International audience ; This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments.

International audience ; "This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments."

This paper tries to grasp the different links of the issue of climate change in the public debate from the point of view of adaptation. Firstly, it is a question of the novelty introduced by the climate problem on ecological sentiment, a novelty which, apart from the dramatic nature of the consequences, appears fundamental on several levels. It is necessary to deal with the all-encompassing nature of the climate issue. Secondly, given the diversity of risks related to climate change and their capacity to destabilize democracies, what kind of adaptation is conceivable? We need to go back to the root of what adaptation means, and consider the fact that adaptation emerges from an aesthetic that amounts to taking care of ourselves in the environment, paying attention to what makes our lives possible. Thirdly, and finally, given the total nature of these risks, it is relevant to redefine the links between risk representations and risk itself. Faced with this, lost in the whirlwind of media realities, adaptation can be thought of as a way of anchoring in territories so as to give a place to possible collective actions and learning in connection with living environments